Which would then set up a barnburner rally going into options the following week.
Just to keep it real, then, 20-days of downside from here would put us to Friday, November 12th (on trading-days). The fast waves seem to be the counter-trend moves. Gann’s work) because experientially, the slow wave seems to be the dominant market direction. Which gives us an interesting notion (at least, if you study W.D. Wave II – the rally which we’re thinking either ended Friday (or should this week) would be in the area of 8-trading days. Which means the Wave 1 down was about 20-trading days. And the low since (on an aggregated markets basis) was October 4th. We do cast our eye today on charts suggesting Labor Day was the high. Again, there’s walls at Infinity and we’re really just a planet of apes if we haven’t gotten real about it. But the dollar is down to 3 1/2-cent of purchasing power on 100 back then. We have been loading “debt into money” since the banker coup of 1913…and don’t get me wrong, it’s been a useful ride. Show me the Space Elevator working… then I can get interested.įor now, I’m planning a 900 calorie breakfast, a supply run, and funding it all with made-up money which is a similar problem into and of itself. But in the right now – this Monday morning world – ain’t no such proof of concept. Yes! If we engineer a dimensional portal breakthrough, or we bend space-time manifolds? Yeah, then things change. Because there’s not enough energy leftover from feeding 7.6 billion people and still have enough left over to have a new positive ROI from colonization of Planet 2. There was a book written a good while back – want to say 20-years – and it looked at the problem of lift (as in “into space”) and it suggested that because of limitations of resources, the WHOLE FREAKING WORLD will only have one major chance at getting to a new planet. When we read Elon Musk hopes he has enough wealth ‘to extend life to Mars’, but not everyone’s amused? Well, we’re not amused either. Yet, he’s got the exact-same calorie management problem I do. Yet, is it good for us?įrankly, with my (aging) metabolism, even doing all the “making” “writing” and “inventing” that goes on around here, it’s hard to understand the “cash accumulators.” Like the Elon Musk is worth $230-billion story this weekend. The further into six-figures the checking account goes, the more I’ve had to come to terms with the “reasonable limits of Success.” We can afford an absurd excess of calories. I mean real “porker-obese-morbidly” crap. The truth – which people avoid like the plague because there are right-behavioral implicates – is that in America, anyone with a $75,000 annual income can be fat.
People often, understand, confuse “ego-driven” desired outcomes with “what’s really success?” No…it’s really about being able to live an others-directed, well-grounded life, with some modest comforts, and in good health. The whole point of doing the MBA, writing a number of books, and tinkering with a time machine and how people already are “spilling the future” has little to do with making a shit-load of money. As usual, please pay close attention to the boxed area here: You see, as of Friday, our Peoplenomics Aggregate Index met our long-forecast target for last week’s trading being a major Wave 2 rally. Reader Note: Do not adjust your monitor! (Sounds like the “Outer Limits” dude, huh?) Yes, our logo is smaller for better appearance as in more screen space for content.